Конфликты низкой интенсивности в американской военно-политической стретегии в начале XXI века - Владимир Игоревич Батюк

30

Quadrennial Defense Review Report. February 2010. U.S. Department of Defense. P. 32. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/QDR/QDR_as_of_29JAN10_1600.pdf.

31

Grossman E.M. Pentagon Readies Competition for Global-Strike Weapon. Global Security Newswire. June 24, 2011. Available at: http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/penta-gon-readies-competition-for-global-strike-weapon/

32

Woolf A.F. Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues. R41464. Congressional Research Service. April 6, 2018. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R41464.pdf.

33

Ibidem.

34

Department of Defense, Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Estimates. February 2018. Available at: http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2019/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/RDTE_DAs_Vol_3B_of_5_OSD_FY19PB-RDTE_Exhibits_BA4-7.pdf.

35

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Chief Financial Officer, Defense Budget Overview, U.S. Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2017 Budget Request. February 2016. Available at: http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Docu-ments/defbudget/fy2017/FY2017_Budget_Request_Overview_Book.pdf.

36

114th Congress of the United States of America. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/s2943/BILLS-114s2943enr.pdf.

37

DoD Testimony — 109th Congress — First Session (2005). General James E. Cartwright, USMC, Commander, United States Strategic Command — Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Strategic Forces and Nuclear Weapons Issue in Review of the Defense Authorization Request for Fiscal Year 2006 (.doc). April 4, 2005. Available at: http://www.dod.mil/dodgc/olc/testimony_old/109_first.html.

38

Hyper-Glide Delivery Systems and the Implications for Strategic Stability and Arms Reductions. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. April 2015. Available at: http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/45558/Hyperglide%20Final%20Report.pdf?sequence=4.

39

Цит. по: Woolf A.F. Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues…

40

Ibidem.

41

После проявленного СТРАТКОМом интереса к этому вопросу один из экспертов подсчитал, что таковых целей могло быть от 10 до 30 %. См.: Woolf A.F. Conventional Prompt Global Strike and Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues…

42

House Armed Services Subcommittee, Strategic Forces Subcommittee Testimony. General Kevin Chilton, U.S. Strategic Command. Wash., DC, February 27, 2008. Available at: https://www.stratcom.mil/speeches/2008/11/House_Armed_Services_Subcommittee_Strategic_Forces_Subcommittee_Testimony/printable

43

Elaine M. Grossman. Conventional Arms No Substitute for Nuclear: Strategic Command Official. February 29, 2012. Available at: http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/con-ventional-arms-no-substitute-nuclear-strategic-command-official/

44

Mosher, David E. et al. Beyond the Nuclear Shadow: A Phased Approach for Improving Nuclear Safety and U.S.-Russian Relations. RAND Corporation, 2003. Р. 5. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1666/MR1666.pref.pdf.

45

National Research Council of the National Academies. U.S. Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Issues for 2008 and Beyond, Wash., DC, August 2008. Р. 72. Available at: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12061/us-conventional-prompt-global-strike-issues-for-2008-and-beyond.

46

Договор между Российской Федерацией и Соединенными Штатами Америки о мерах по дальнейшему сокращению и ограничению стратегических наступательных вооружений. Available at: http://news.kremlin.ru/ref_notes/512

47

Article-by-Article Analysis of the New START Treaty Documents. U.S. Department of State. Available at: http://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/141829.htm#text

48

Long-range precision-guided conventional weapons: Implications for arms control and strategic stability. Joint meeting of members of the Centre russe d’etudes politiques and the Trialogue Club International. Geneva, April 24, 2013. Available at: http://www.pircenter.org/media/content/files/11/13722654920.pdf.

49

Gady F.-S. China Tests New Hypersonic Weapon. The Diplomat. November 26, 2015. Available at: http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/china-tests-new-hypersonic-weapon/.

50

См: Prompt Global Strike: American and Foreign Developments. Testimony by James M. Acton before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. December 8, 2015. Available at: http://docs.house.gov/meetings/AS/AS29/20151208/104276/HHRG-114-AS29-Wstate-ActonJ-20151208.pdf.

51

Sills L.G. Space-Based Global Strike: Understanding Strategic and Military Implications. Occasional Paper No. 24. Center for Strategy and Technology. Air War College. Montgomery, 2001. P. 12.

52

См.: Батюк В.И. Война с негосударственными противниками в американской военной стратегии // Россия и Америка в XXI веке. 2014. № 2. Available at: http://www.rusus.ru/?act=read&id=407 (30.12.2015)

53

Tucker M., Lyons R. Silent Watch: The Role of Army Air and Missile Defense // Joint Forces Quarterly, #73. April 2014. P. 93–98. Available at: http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-73/jfq-73.pdf (accessed 30.12.2015).

54

Preparing America to Win Low-Intensity Conflicts. The Heritage Foundation. August 31, 1990. Available at: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1990/08/pre-paring-america-to-win-low-intensity-conflicts (accessed 30.10.2015).

55

Excerpts of classified Nuclear Posture Review Report submitted to Congress. December 31, 2001. P. 3 Available at: http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/policy/dod/npr.htm (accessed 06.02.2010).

56

Crouch II, J. D. United States Missile Defense Policy Before the Senate Armed Service Committee. March 18, 2003. P. 5. Available at: http://armed-services.senate.gov/statemnt/2003/March/Crouch.pdf (accessed 13.08.2011).

57

Perry W., Schlesinger J. America’s Strategic Posture. The Final Report of the Congressional Commission of the Strategic Posture of the United States. Wash., DC, United States Institute of Peace Press, 2009. P. 32.

58

Lt Gen Patrick J. O’Reilly. Director, Missile Defense Agency Before the House Armed Services Committee, Subcommittee on Strategic Forces. May 21, 2009. P. 2–3. Available at: http://www.mda.mil/global/documents/pdf/ps_hasc052109.pdf (accessed 06.05.2013).

59

Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report. Department of Defense. February 2010. P. 3, 5–6. Available at: http://www.defense.gov/bmdr/docs/BMDR%20as%20of%2026JAN10%200630_for%20web.pdf (accessed 16.02.2012).

60

Ibid. P. 11, 12.

61

Ibid. P. V.

62

Ibid. P. VI, 23, 26.

63

Ibid. P. 6–7.

64

Ibid. P. 7.

65

Ibid. P. 7–8.

66

Ibid. P. 12.

67

Nuclear Posture Review Report. Department of Defense. April 2010. P. XIII, 6, 7, 15, 33, 46. Available at: www.defense.gov/npr/docs/2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf (accessed 22.02.2012); The National Security Strategy of the United State., The White House. May 2010, P. 41. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf (accessed 22.02.2012).