Конфликты низкой интенсивности в американской военно-политической стретегии в начале XXI века - Владимир Игоревич Батюк
About the authors
Tatiana B. ANICHKINA, Candidate of Sciences (Political), Research Fellow, the Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISKRAN). 2/3 Khlebny per., Moscow 121069, Russian Federation; Research Fellow, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences. 23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation. E-mail: anichkinat@gmail.com
Vladimir I. BATYUK, Doctor of Sciences (History), Head, Center for Military-Political Studies, Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISKRAN). 2/3 Khlebny per., Moscow 121069, Russian Federation. E-mail: ctas@inbox.ru
Oleg O. KRIVOLAPOV, Candidate of Sciences (Political), Researcher Fellow, Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISKRAN). 2/3 Khlebny per., Moscow 121069, Russian Federation. E-mail: altus9@rambler.ru
Yury V. MOROZOV, Candidate of Sciences (Military), Leading Research Fellow, the Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISKRAN). 2/3 Khlebny per., Moscow 121069, Russian Federation; Institute Far Eastern Studies Russian Academy of Sciences. E-mail: morozovyury51@yandex.ru
Dmitry A. VOLODIN, Candidate of Sciences (History), Senior Research Fellow, the Institute of U.S. and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Head, Canadian Department. 2/3 Khlebny per., Moscow 121069, Russian Federation. E-mail: dmvldn@gmail.com
The Low-Intensity Conflicts in American Military-Political Strategy in the Early 21st Century / V.I.Batyuk ed.; Institute for the U.S. and Canadian Studies RAS. Moscow: Izdatelstvo VES MIR, 2018. –192 pp.
Примечания
1
Field Manual (FM) 7-98 No. 7-98. Headquarters. Department of the Army. Wash., DC, October 19, 1992. P. 1–1.
2
FM 3-24 MCWP 3-33.5. Insurgencies and Countering Insurgencies Conventional Forces and Special Operations Forces Synchronization. May 2014. P. 1–1.
3
Bond M. Hybrid War A New Paradigm for Stability Operations in Failing States. // USAWC Strategy Research Project. 2007. P. 4.
4
George C. Casey. America’s Army in an Era of Persistent Conflict // Army Magazine. October 28, 2008.
5
U.S. Army, Field Manual 3–0 Operations C-1 (GPO, Wash., DC, February 2011), 1–5.3 Hybrid Threats // Headquarters Department of the Army G-3/5/7 Information Paper, (Wash., DC, April 20, 2009).
6
Hybrid Warfare. Briefing to the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities. Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. September 10, 2010. GAO-10-1036R. P. 4.
7
Montalbano E. Auditors Find DoD Hasn’t Defined Cyber Warfare // Darkreading. September 14, 2010. Available at: http://www.darkreading.com/risk-management/audi-tors-find-dod-hasnt-defined-cyber-warfare/d/d-id/1092427
8
Fleming B. The Hybrid Threat Concept: Contemporary War, Military Planning and the Advent of Unrestricted Operational Art. A Monograph. School of Advanced Military Studies United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth. Kansas AY 2011. P. 2–3.
9
Hoffman F. Hybrid Warfare and Challenges // JFQ. Issue 52, 1st quarter 2009. P. 37.
10
McCulloh T., and Johnson R. Hybrid Warfare. JSOU Report 13-4. August 2013. P. 9.
11
Airpower for Hybrid Warfare. May 2009. P. 13.
12
The National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015. P. 4.
13
The National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2015. P. 8.
14
Senate Armed Services Committee Statement of General Philip Breedlove Commander U.S. Forces Europe. April 30, 2015. P. 4.
15
Ibidem.
16
Quadrennial Defense Review Report. February 6, 2006. — Wash., D.C.: The Department of Defense. P. VI–VII.
17
См.: Корсаков Г.Б. Новая революция в военном деле и реформирование вооруженных сил США // США Канада.
18
National Defense Strategy. — Wash., D.C.: Department of Defense, June 2008. P. 17–18.
19
Caldwell W., and Leonard S. Field Manual 3-07, Stability Operations: Upshifting the engine of change // Military Review. — July — August 2008. P. 9.
20
Gentile G. Let’s build an Army to Win All Wars //JFQ. Issue 52, 1st quarter 2009. P. 31.
21
Statement by the President on ISIL. September 10, 2014. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/10/statement-president-isil-1
22
Stewart V. Statement for the Record. Worldwide Threat Assessment. Armed Services Committee. United States Senate. May 23, 2017. P. 2.
23
Настоящее определение состоит из двух отдельных элементов: определения высокоточного оружия, данного Военным энциклопедическим словарем под редакцией Н.В. Огаркова (Москва, 1984. C. 159), и определения систем вооружений большой дальности, принятого в рамках российско-американского режима по контролю над стратегическими наступательными вооружениями.
24
Müller H., Schöring N. RMA and Nuclear Weapons: A Calamitous Link for Arms Control // Disarmament Forum. 2001. № 4. P. 17–26, 18.
25
Мясников Е. Контрсиловой потенциал высокоточного оружия // Ядерное распространение: новые технологии, вооружения и договоры/ Под ред. А. Арбатова, В. Дворкина. М., 2009. С. 107.
26
Bailey J.B.A. Field Artillery and Fire Power. Annapolis, 2004. P. 530.
27
U.S. Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Time Critical Conventional Strike from Strategic Standoff. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force. March 2009. P. 2. Available at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA498403.pdf.
28
Quadrennial Defense Review Report. September 30, 2001. U.S. Department of Defense. P. 43. Available at: http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/qdr2001.pdf.
29
Quadrennial Defense Review Report. February 6, 2006. U.S. Department of Defense. P.





